분류 | 게시판 |
베스트 |
|
유머 |
|
이야기 |
|
이슈 |
|
생활 |
|
취미 |
|
학술 |
|
방송연예 |
|
방송프로그램 |
|
디지털 |
|
스포츠 |
|
야구팀 |
|
게임1 |
|
게임2 |
|
기타 |
|
운영 |
|
임시게시판 |
|
안녕하세요.
한국내 사드 배치와 한일 정부간 위안부 합의가 미국의 아시아에 대한 전략에서 출발하는 것으로 보여지는 부분입니다.
미국은 미국의 이익을 우선으로 전략을 수립합니다. 이러한 상황에서 아래의 두가지 제안 (1. 사드 배치 및 연계 강화, 2. 한일간 한일미간 동맹강화) 이 우리나라에 어떠한 변화를 가져올지 우리 나름의 평가가 필요하다고 생각합니다.
저는 사드배치가 동북아시아의 긴장을 강화시키고, 시민의 생명과 안녕을 위협한다고 생각합니다.
사드배치 반대 백악관 서명 https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/rescind-decision-deploy-thaad-antimissile-system-south-korea
서명후 메일이 오면 메일 본문에서 Confirm을 눌러야 서명이 마무리됩니다.
자료 1. “Pivot 2.0” How the Administration and Congress Can Work Together to Sustain American Engagement in Asia to 2016, CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (CSIS), January 2015, U.S.
Chapter 4. The Next Two Years in Korea
What must the administration contend with in its remaining two years in office on the Korean Peninsula? First, the United States is likely to see the next series of North Korean nuclear and ballistic missile tests. ...
In any event, the administration must be prepared to meet these provocations with concrete measures that acknowledge the necessity of deterring a nuclear North Korea. This includes deploying more advanced missile defense systems on the peninsula and its vicinity, as well as encouraging the ROK to enhance its joint operational capabilities with the existing U.S. missile defense assets and ISR (intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance) sensors in the region. ...
The administration must also work to mend Japan-ROK relations. ... The bilateral relationship between Seoul and Tokyo, and the three-way U.S.-Japan-Korea relationship, should, in the administration’s eyes, be seen as the most reliable source of stability in Asia. Others might argue that the anchor is the U.S.-China relationship, but U.S.-China relations are more the effect, not the cause, of stability. That is, a stable Washington-Beijing relationship equates with regional peace, but the best influence on this relationship is a strong U.S.-Japan-Korea relationship. ...
...
So, with the 50th anniversary of Japan-ROK normalization in 2015, the White House must work to close the gap between the allies in the form of completion of the information-sharing agreement (General Security of Military Information Agreement, GSOMIA), military parts servicing agreement (Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement, ACSA), a high tempo of trilateral consultations and exercising, and eventually, a collective defense statement among the three allies. This all must be done with a light touch, not American pressure, given sensitivities in Korea, but the message must be clear: The two allies must work together on common security needs despite unresolved historical-emotional issues.
자료 2. Press Conference by the Defense Minister Nakatani (April 10, 2015), Japan Ministry of Defense, http://www.mod.go.jp/e/pressconf/2015/04/150410.html
...
Question:
I have a related question. What would you like to discuss with the ROK counterpart if the ministerial meeting is realized?
Minister: First of all, we would like to discuss the pending issue of the Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) and the General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA), which involve information sharing and resource cooperation. With the detailed contents nearly completed, they had once come close to conclusion but this has yet to be realized. Therefore, we would like to deepen relations with the ROK in this area, as well as missile defense in light of the fact that missiles from North Korea have become a serious threat to Japan.
...
Question:
My question deviates from the issue of Japan-ROK defense. The U.S. Forces in the ROK have allegedly indicated their intention to place a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) missile system in the ROK. As far as missile defense is concerned, I gather that this will have some implications for Japan's defense. What is your view on the placement of a THAAD missile system in the ROK?
Minister:
This is a defense policy matter that will be decided in the ROK. Issues such as stability in East Asia are also matters between the United States and the ROK. U.S. Secretary of State Ashton Carter went to the ROK after visiting Japan, and the United States and the ROK discussed these matters. During Secretary Carter's visit to Japan, discussion took place on missile defense between Japan and the United States. Japan and the ROK need to work together closely on missile defense, including on information exchange and sharing. I hope to discuss these matters with the ROK.
Question:
I have a related question. During the previous meeting on GSOMIA, the MOD and the Ministry of National Defense of the ROK were able to reach an agreement, but the Cheong Wa Dae put a stop to the agreement in consideration of anti-Japanese sentiment. Regarding anti-Japanese sentiment, do you perceive that this time the environment is conducive to the conclusion of GSOMIA?
Minister:
This is up to the ROK to decide. Because an agreement has been reached on the content among our defense authorities, I hope that the agreement is swiftly approved in the ROK
...
Question:
I have a question about GSOMIA. Japan, the United States, and the ROK signed a memorandum of understanding on information sharing last December. Is my understanding correct that Japan will explore ways to conclude a separate agreement from the MOU, which is GSOMIA?
Minister:
Last year's arrangement was on cooperation among the three countries of Japan, the United States, and the ROK. GSOMIA is a bilateral agreement between Japan and the ROK. I believe this agreement is necessary to conduct exercises, cooperation on equipment, and all kinds of operations, such as missile response. I consider that a bilateral GSOMIA is necessary.
...
죄송합니다. 댓글 작성은 회원만 가능합니다.