모바일 오유 바로가기
http://m.todayhumor.co.kr
분류 게시판
베스트
  • 베스트오브베스트
  • 베스트
  • 오늘의베스트
  • 유머
  • 유머자료
  • 유머글
  • 이야기
  • 자유
  • 고민
  • 연애
  • 결혼생활
  • 좋은글
  • 자랑
  • 공포
  • 멘붕
  • 사이다
  • 군대
  • 밀리터리
  • 미스터리
  • 술한잔
  • 오늘있잖아요
  • 투표인증
  • 새해
  • 이슈
  • 시사
  • 시사아카이브
  • 사회면
  • 사건사고
  • 생활
  • 패션
  • 패션착샷
  • 아동패션착샷
  • 뷰티
  • 인테리어
  • DIY
  • 요리
  • 커피&차
  • 육아
  • 법률
  • 동물
  • 지식
  • 취업정보
  • 식물
  • 다이어트
  • 의료
  • 영어
  • 맛집
  • 추천사이트
  • 해외직구
  • 취미
  • 사진
  • 사진강좌
  • 카메라
  • 만화
  • 애니메이션
  • 포니
  • 자전거
  • 자동차
  • 여행
  • 바이크
  • 민물낚시
  • 바다낚시
  • 장난감
  • 그림판
  • 학술
  • 경제
  • 역사
  • 예술
  • 과학
  • 철학
  • 심리학
  • 방송연예
  • 연예
  • 음악
  • 음악찾기
  • 악기
  • 음향기기
  • 영화
  • 다큐멘터리
  • 국내드라마
  • 해외드라마
  • 예능
  • 팟케스트
  • 방송프로그램
  • 무한도전
  • 더지니어스
  • 개그콘서트
  • 런닝맨
  • 나가수
  • 디지털
  • 컴퓨터
  • 프로그래머
  • IT
  • 안티바이러스
  • 애플
  • 안드로이드
  • 스마트폰
  • 윈도우폰
  • 심비안
  • 스포츠
  • 스포츠
  • 축구
  • 야구
  • 농구
  • 바둑
  • 야구팀
  • 삼성
  • 두산
  • NC
  • 넥센
  • 한화
  • SK
  • 기아
  • 롯데
  • LG
  • KT
  • 메이저리그
  • 일본프로야구리그
  • 게임1
  • 플래시게임
  • 게임토론방
  • 엑스박스
  • 플레이스테이션
  • 닌텐도
  • 모바일게임
  • 게임2
  • 던전앤파이터
  • 마비노기
  • 마비노기영웅전
  • 하스스톤
  • 히어로즈오브더스톰
  • gta5
  • 디아블로
  • 디아블로2
  • 피파온라인2
  • 피파온라인3
  • 워크래프트
  • 월드오브워크래프트
  • 밀리언아서
  • 월드오브탱크
  • 블레이드앤소울
  • 검은사막
  • 스타크래프트
  • 스타크래프트2
  • 베틀필드3
  • 마인크래프트
  • 데이즈
  • 문명
  • 서든어택
  • 테라
  • 아이온
  • 심시티5
  • 프리스타일풋볼
  • 스페셜포스
  • 사이퍼즈
  • 도타2
  • 메이플스토리1
  • 메이플스토리2
  • 오버워치
  • 오버워치그룹모집
  • 포켓몬고
  • 파이널판타지14
  • 배틀그라운드
  • 기타
  • 종교
  • 단어장
  • 자료창고
  • 운영
  • 공지사항
  • 오유운영
  • 게시판신청
  • 보류
  • 임시게시판
  • 메르스
  • 세월호
  • 원전사고
  • 2016리오올림픽
  • 2018평창올림픽
  • 코로나19
  • 2020도쿄올림픽
  • 게시판찾기
  • 오유인페이지
    개인차단 상태
    sergelang님의
    개인페이지입니다
    가입 : 15-03-18
    방문 : 414회
    닉네임변경 이력
    회원차단
    회원차단해제
     

    sergelang님의 댓글입니다.
    번호 제목 댓글날짜 추천/비공감 삭제
    107 요즘 잘 나가는 한국 수학자.jpg [새창] 2017-06-29 18:58:49 4 삭제
    아닙니다. 본문 읽어보셨나요?
    106 요즘 잘 나가는 한국 수학자.jpg [새창] 2017-06-29 16:28:54 17 삭제
    기사 본문을 보시면 상당히 자세하게 설명되어 있습니다. 리드 추측의 statement 는 중고등학생도 이해할 수 있을 만큼 쉽습니다.

    로타 추측은 (in some way)리드 추측의 일반화라고 하는데 내용이 좀 어렵...
    105 신혼밥상!! 자랑글!! [새창] 2017-02-21 08:10:32 1 삭제
    남친 시켜요
    104 구미 오상고 학생들, "국정교과서 연구학교 신청 철회하라" 교내 시위 [새창] 2017-02-16 21:10:22 23 삭제
    역시 장군님의 고향 구미!

    장군님 보고 계시죠?

    103 고앵이 키우면 안되는이유 [새창] 2017-01-16 09:57:41 9 삭제
    1 의외로 먹는 사진들만 잔뜩 있음...
    102 무료 머신러닝 책 받아가세요. [새창] 2016-12-05 23:22:17 0 삭제
    9시간 정도 남았네요.
    101 엄청난 드라마 낭만닥터ㅎㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ [새창] 2016-11-09 10:42:21 5 삭제
    ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
    100 스냅백에 당황한 여대생 [새창] 2016-11-08 00:32:39 1 삭제
    아니 그게 아니고 일제냐 미제냐의 차이...일제도 미국 수출용은...읍읍
    99 지금 1박2일 김유정양 세월호리본달고 나오네요~ [새창] 2016-11-07 21:02:00 1 삭제
    곱다...마음이 참말로 곱다...
    98 당신은 어느 부대인가요? [새창] 2016-10-23 07:32:46 0 삭제
    크으......육군의 숨겨진 망고부대. 젖과 꿀이 흐르는 가나안 같은 부대.
    97 19주의)아무래도 사겨야겠다(+추가) [새창] 2016-10-19 01:34:27 8 삭제
    스트레스가 좀 풀리네요. 감사합니다.
    96 논리왕 [새창] 2016-10-17 14:03:42 0/11 삭제
    The war on drugs: Is it a genuine public health crusade or an attempt to carry out what author Michelle Alexander characterizes as "the New Jim Crow"?

    A new report by Dan Baum for Harper's Magazine suggests the latter. Specifically, Baum refers to a quote from John Ehrlichman, who served as domestic policy chief for President Richard Nixon when the administration declared its war on drugs in 1971. According to Baum, Ehrlichman said in 1994 that the drug war was a ploy to undermine Nixon's political opposition — meaning, black people and critics of the Vietnam War:

    At the time, I was writing a book about the politics of drug prohibition. I started to ask Ehrlichman a series of earnest, wonky questions that he impatiently waved away. "You want to know what this was really all about?" he asked with the bluntness of a man who, after public disgrace and a stretch in federal prison, had little left to protect. "The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."
    This is an incredibly blunt, shocking response — one with troubling implications for the 45-year-old war on drugs.

    It's possible Ehrlichman wasn't being honest, given that he reportedly felt bitter and betrayed by Nixon after he spent time in prison over the Watergate scandal. Nixon also very much despised drugs, which likely played a role in his policies beyond political goals. And his drug czar, Jerome Jaffe, strongly pushed for treating drugs as a health issue, not solely a criminal matter as Ehrlichman suggested.


    But the claim of racial prejudice is not implausible. Although black Americans aren't more likely to use or sell drugs, they're much more likely to be arrested for them. And when black people are convicted of drug charges, they generally face longer prison sentences for the same crimes, according to a 2012 report from the US Sentencing Commission.


    Ehrlichman claimed this was a goal of the drug war, not an unintended consequence. And Baum cites this as one of many reasons to end the drug war once and for all.


    Baum's argument: Drug prohibition began with poor intentions, it has contributed to terrible consequences (racial disparities in the justice system and drug-fueled violence around the world), and it has failed to significantly curtail drug abuse and trafficking. So we should try a new approach — and legalize and regulate drugs.

    But in doing this, Baum glosses over a few options. Even if it's true that the drug war was launched on faulty reasons, that doesn't mean it hasn't led to some benefits. And even if those benefits aren't worth the costs of the current model of prohibition, there are alternatives to pulling back drug prohibition besides legalization.

    As I've written before, the drug war does likely prevent some drug use: One study by Jon Caulkins, a drug policy expert at Carnegie Mellon University, suggested that prohibition multiplies the price of hard drugs like cocaine by as much as 10 times. And illicit drugs obviously aren't available through easy means — one can't just walk into a CVS and buy heroin. So the drug war is likely stopping some drug use: Caulkins estimates that legalization could lead hard drug abuse to triple, although he told me it could go much higher.


    America's latest drug epidemic provides some evidence for Caulkins's claims. In the past couple decades, doctors loosened access to very addictive and potentially deadly opioid painkillers. Painkiller abuse exploded, leading not just to more overdose deaths but to people trying other opioids, such as heroin, and overdosing on those as well. So more access led to more abuse and deaths.

    Does this mean the war on drugs, as it's currently fought, is worth it? Not necessarily. It's a matter of weighing the pros and cons of the current model of drug prohibition.

    So maybe the drug war reduces drug use. But it also enables and reinforces the justice system's biases against minority Americans. And it perpetuates a black market for drugs that fuels violence in the US and around the world, particularly in Mexico.


    But there are options to draw down the war on drugs without legalization. The US could decriminalize — remove jail time and other criminal penalties for personal possession but not sales — and emphasize prevention and treatment, as Portugal has done. It could allow supervised injection sites for heroin users to provide a safe place to use the drug, as Canada, Switzerland, and several others have done. It could allow for the medical use of some drugs, such as psychedelics, as some researchers have pushed for. These are steps countries and states could take without legalizing drugs.

    Baum does, however, acknowledge that even if a country does legalize, there are various ways to do it. Governments could spend much, much more on prevention and treatment programs alongside legalization to deal with a potential wave of new drug users. They could require and regulate licenses to buy drugs, as some states do with guns. Or they could ban private, for-profit sales of drugs, limiting greedy companies' abilities to market and sell the drugs no matter the consequence (as tobacco companies have done to get Americans hooked on cigarettes — to still very deadly effects).

    None of these policies would wholly eliminate drug abuse, drug deaths, or drug-related violence and crime. But drug policy is often about picking the best out of the available bad options, rather than picking the perfect solution.

    Still, there are far more options than prohibition and legalization, and different drugs with all sorts of different risks likely merit different policies. But it's going to be very difficult to get to the right balance of policies if the debate is framed as deciding between only legalization and prohibition.
    95 정말이지 트위터는 굉장한것 같아요. [새창] 2016-10-17 08:54:27 2 삭제
    너 휴가 짤렸다고 겁만 줬을 가능성이 높습니다. 연가 제한은 상급부대 지휘관 결재까지 받아야되는 귀찮은 일이라서 훈련소에서는 웬만큼 큰 사고를 치지 않고서는 받기 힘든 징계입니다.
    94 초코에몽에 이어 무민우유도 남양이었네요 [새창] 2016-10-15 17:31:53 0 삭제
    우유는 제발 매일만 믿고 갔으면 좋겠다.
    93 워매 여긴 어디여 [새창] 2016-10-12 18:33:49 0 삭제
    나 이거 알아. 삼국지에서 나왔는데 여기가 장판파야.



    [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

     
    단축키 운영진에게 바란다(삭제요청/제안) 운영게 게시판신청 자료창고 보류 개인정보취급방침 청소년보호정책 모바일홈