<P> </P> <P> </P> <P>고수님들 지나가다가 그냥 눈 풀기용으로 한번 봐주십시요.</P> <P> </P> <P>굽십굽신~ 굽신굽신~</P> <P> </P> <P> </P> <P> </P> <P>the speaker cast doubts on the advantage of drganic food products.</P> <P> </P> <P>the speaker cast doubt on the suggestion of the reading passage that because of more complex componants in various parts of <BR>plants that provieded through the living soil without chamical pestisides, organic food products can provide humans <BR>with more healther nutrients than conventional food products does.<BR>the speaker actually pointed out that chamical residue could be anywhere, <BR>such as rivers, ponds, ans airs so that there is still godd chance to absorbe the pestiside residues or chamical ingrediants even in the organic foods.</P> <P> </P> <P>the speaker also portrayed doubt on the suggestion of the reading passage that constant and aomplex mixture of molecules<BR>give organic food products plenty of flavor and make it more tasty.<BR>the main argument presented by the speaker was that the taste and flavor are affected by various factor not just the way they were grown.<BR>also quoting the remark of many experts, the speaker suspected that organic food products' flavor and taste do not last long.</P> <P> </P> <P>finally, the claim of the reading that organic food prducts are raised by enviormantal frendelly method so that they can contribute to <BR>ecosystems aws also denied by the speaker.<BR>in fect, the speaker argued that animal waste are used for organic plants as the replacements of chamical fertilizers, <BR>contageous deseases could be spreaded, consequently this is harm for not only the ecosystems but also the human health.</P> <P> </P> <P>in short, the speaker portrayed suspicion on the reading passages' argument. </P> <P> </P> <P> </P> <P> </P>
댓글 분란 또는 분쟁 때문에 전체 댓글이 블라인드 처리되었습니다.