<P>한번 훑어 보시고 문법 오류나 문장 오류좀 지적해 주시면 감사하겠습니다.</P> <P> </P> <P>The speaker pointe out that the DRE system is not always as advantageous as stated in the passage.</P> <P> </P> <P>The Leture claimed that there are still a lot number of people who find it difficult to use DRE system.</P> <P>specifically, whereas the reading suggests that RDE is so convenience that most people can use it easly.</P> <P>The Lecture actually pointed out that there are still great number of people who are not compotable with using computer.</P> <P>The Lecture took the results of recently done election as an example.</P> <P>In this (필터링 차단) example, it was observed that almost 20 percent of voters needed help, which greatly defets the true meaning of secret vallot.</P> <P> </P> <P>senond, The Lecture also portrayed doubt on the suggestion on the passage that DRE can provide quick results of election.</P> <P>the main proof presented by the speaker was that in some problematic situations such as machine failure or suspicious results, there is no way to recover it. </P> <P>in this case, the only way to solve the problems is re-vote.</P> <P>as a result it takes much more time than general election (여기서 뭘 써야할지 모르겠네요... needed 인가....)</P> <P> </P> <P>finally, the claim of the reading that DRE can provide interactive informations, as a result it can increase creadibility of election was also denied by the speaker.</P> <P>in fect, the lecture argued that there is always possibility of machine failures or system bugs.</P> <P>furthermore, the voters are unlikely to trust the results of elections, because there is no way to check out whether wheir votes are properly counted.</P> <P> </P> <P>in short, The speaker casts doubts on advantage of DRE system</P>
댓글 분란 또는 분쟁 때문에 전체 댓글이 블라인드 처리되었습니다.